The Basic Principles Of official site

The Basic Principles Of official site

Blog Article

PersianGulfPersianGulf 11.2k1010 gold badges5555 silver badges8282 bronze badges 5 Thank you. I think my script, when run within the server, is getting termed like this: sh myscript so Though my script starts with #!/bin/bash that is in some way not sufficient. So... how can I source a file in this case? Thanks

I'm not absolutely sure what was the precise cause for that but it surely looks like myfile was searched for on $PATH and in $CWD. I suppose that's approximately some configuration in shell.

The most common phrasing is “check, be sure to.” I think this Seems a bit blunt so I frequently say “Could I obtain the check remember to?” which I do think is just a little more polite.

ChinmoyChinmoy 10111 bronze badge one 1 A more correct syntax in (t)csh could be setenv PATH $ PATH:q :/path/to/increase. Or better established path = ($path:q /path/to/add) or better still in tcsh: set -file route = ($route:q /path/to/increase) to help keep the elements distinctive.

Is there another thing, something essential, I may very well be overlooking? I have checked the paths I am utilizing and I do not see any problems. This dilemma is repeatable. I am jogging Ubuntu on the Linode server and my scripts all begin with:

Whenever a file is checked out to you personally, that you are the only 1 permitted generating improvements to it. The file will remain locked (checked-out) till you release it. Admins with appropriate privileges can discard the checked-out lock created by a user.

For instance, in lieu of "This link exhibits an example of the McGurk impact," want "Here is undoubtedly an illustration of the McGurk outcome." In the event the screenreader reads the former, there will likely be no context, though the latter gives all the context that is needed to be aware of the link.

The best way to seek advice from the final of more than two factors in a listing without reiterating the names? Warm Network Concerns

Basic inquiries on spelling, meaning or pronunciation are off-subject as they ought to be answered using a dictionary. See: Plan for inquiries that are completely answerable that has a dictionary

Maulik VMaulik V sixty six.4k111111 gold badges313313 silver badges461461 bronze badges Include a comment  

For those who have been gonna take a vote, I personally wouldn't use check out, but I would utilize the third sentence.

Virendra KumarVirendra Kumar 10122 bronze badges 2 2 This remedy looks like it my response absolutely was copy and pasted in the documentation for one particular peice of program with out providing attribution or context and with out mentioning that program development has largely moved far from the "exceptional checkout" model.

Mohsen KamraniMohsen Kamrani 2,1301010 gold badges3737 silver badges4848 bronze badges 1 I do think "check this source code out from the repository" Appears much better than "check out this source code on the repository" or "check out this source code out of the repository".

Stack Trade network is made up of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the biggest, most dependable on the internet Local community for developers to learn, share their know-how, and Develop their careers. Visit Stack Trade